Text of Guest Commentary in the July 6, 2006 Chanhassen Villager by Minnetonka School Board Member William Wenmark, copied in whole from that newspaper. Those points which correspond to objections Mr. Wenmark voiced at the 12-7-06 Minnetonka School Board study session are highlighted in red. Mr. Wenmark was one of seven board members who voted unanimously to bring the International Baccalaureate program to Minnetonka in November 2003.
"IB issues need separation
Recently the Star Tribune published, what to some, may be misleading information about International Baccalaureate (IB). Here is the rest of the story.
IB students in Minnetonka presented their experience to
our school board a few weeks ago. I really enjoyed listening and sharing in
their excitement for their experience. They were particularly excited about
focusing on a subject in great detail, being expected to research, debate and
discuss the subject, and doing all of this while remaining with the same
cohesive group of students and teachers for two years. They also explained that
none of them would have been ready for this intense focused learning approach at
an earlier age. They felt the current two-year, 11th and 12th grade availability
is the correct level to offer IB, although they said it maybe appropriate for
some 10th grader learners. I support there observations conclusions, and
excitements about learning.
Let's be clear, they were excited about the same things that any
group of young developing adolescents would have been - structure, focus,
familiarity, great motivated teachers, and small learning communities. In fact,
some would suggest that it is similar to what we currently find for other
student focused learning communities featuring directed learning such as 504's,
IEP's, Mini School, Industrial Art or PSEO. Some call this differentiated
learning.
AP (Advanced Placement) on the other hand, is concerned with what
most students will experience in college. A compelling question begs to be
asked. If IB is a good delivery system, could AP be delivered in the same way
without an agreement with a foreign country that has a
global agenda?
In history the defeat of the city of Troy involved a gift of a
Trojan horse. IB is the Trojan horse of United
Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) &
International Baccalaureate Organization to eventually and
substantially infiltrate the nationalistic view of the world in our public
education in the United States. In 1996 UNESCO formed a "partnership"
with IBO to form what it called a universal "curriculum framework for peace
education." This is a long term, very patient, war on our
country's founding. It will be another 10 to 20 years or more before this
is completely implemented.
None of the students in IB schools today are part of this agenda,
none of the parents are part of this agenda, and I would suggest that none of
our teachers are involved in this process. They only see the Trojan horse, a
learning concept delivered in a small learning community. At only the IB
administration in Geneva Switzerland is the world agenda discussed in detail.
(Implementing the IB Diploma Programme, Cambridge Press, London, England.)
Yet some in Minnetonka desire to expand IB philosophy into our
elementary and middle schools. If accomplished, IB becomes
a transformational system of education that will exist to promote
internationalism. It is structured to eventually change the attitudes, values,
beliefs and behavior of its students in the United States to conform to the
world government system. This is made clear by Dr. Ian Hill, past deputy
director of IBO, who said that the primary goal of the IBO is the promotion of
"world citizenship." No one at Minnetonka at any level is invested in this
agenda nor would anyone condone this action. They only see the Trojan horse.
The IBO Organization is motivated by the primary goal of this
agenda. "If you are going to change the world you need to get to the children."
It is important to point out that IB is not the United States
College Board Advanced Placement (AP). In fact, AP also has The Advanced
Placement International Diploma (APID) which is a globally recognized
certificate for students with an international outlook without promoting a
global agenda. For IB advocates AP has just become a convenient host to the IB
program for the time being to get a general association with funding and
resources (children and tax funding) to feed the expansion of the IB program.
In summary, the "good" IB is the delivery system
the "bad" IB is the world agenda to conquer/discredit the
United Sates and our nationalist view of the world without firing a shot.
Therefore, we need to talk about two "IB's" without AP which, when separated,
may lead to clearer understanding the concern and debate. It is very clear that
people across the United States and in Minnetonka are learning about the "bad"
IB.
There is so much more...this is just a primer."